Sinkronisasi Kebijakan Pertahanan dalam Operasi Militer dengan Hak Asasi Manusia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51577/jgpi.v3i2.437Keywords:
Hak Asasi Manusia, Kebijakan Pertahanan, Kolaborasi Internasional, Operasi Militer, Tantangan EtikaAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perlunya kebijakan pertahanan untuk memasukkan hak asasi manusia ke dalam operasi militer, mengidentifikasi tantangan etika, meningkatkan kesadaran personel, menetapkan kerangka akuntabilitas, dan menjajaki kolaborasi internasional untuk sinkronisasi. Studi ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, memanfaatkan data sekunder, untuk menganalisis literatur dan studi kasus yang ada mengenai kebijakan pertahanan dan hak asasi manusia, mengidentifikasi kesenjangan dan tantangan. Hasil penelitian ini menyoroti peran penting kebijakan pertahanan dalam memajukan dan melindungi hak asasi manusia selama operasi militer. Laporan ini akan mengidentifikasi tantangan-tantangan etis utama yang dihadapi oleh kekuatan militer dalam mengintegrasikan hak asasi manusia, seperti menyeimbangkan keamanan dengan hak-hak individu dan menanggapi dinamika konflik yang berubah dengan cepat. Selain itu, studi ini akan mengusulkan rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan pelatihan dan pendidikan militer guna meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemahaman tentang hak asasi manusia di kalangan personel. Lebih jauh lagi, penelitian ini akan menekankan perlunya kerangka hukum dan kelembagaan yang komprehensif untuk menjamin akuntabilitas atas pelanggaran hak asasi manusia dalam operasi militer. Terakhir, studi ini akan mengeksplorasi pentingnya kolaborasi dan kerja sama internasional dalam menyelaraskan kebijakan pertahanan dengan hak asasi manusia, termasuk pertukaran praktik terbaik dan penetapan standar bersama. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan wawasan berharga mengenai bagaimana kebijakan pertahanan dapat secara efektif mengintegrasikan pertimbangan hak asasi manusia ke dalam operasi militer. Dengan mengatasi urgensi, tujuan, dan tantangan etika, penelitian ini akan berkontribusi dalam mendorong pendekatan yang lebih etis dan bertanggung jawab terhadap penempatan militer.
References
Abrahamsen, R., & Sandor, A. (2018). The global South and international security. The Oxford Handbook of International Security, 1–18.
Bletter, G. (2003). Israel’s Impunity under International Law. Peace Review, 15(1), 3–9.
Borelli, S. (2013). Domestic investigation and prosecution of atrocities committed during military operations: The impact of judgments of the european court of human rights. Israel Law Review, 46(3), 369–404.
BSR. (2013). Conducting an Effective Human Rights Impact Assessment Guidelines, Steps, and Examples. www.bsr.org.
Buchanan, A., & Keohane, R. O. (2015). Toward a drone accountability regime. Ethics & International Affairs, 29(1), 15–37.
Buckel, C. (2021). A New Look at Operational Art: How We View War Dictates How We Fight It. https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-100/jfq-100_94-100_Buckel.pdf?ver=4oFQDgl4E7nw3ASD63eEqw%3d%3d.
Burkle, F. M., Kushner, A. L., Giannou, C., Paterson, M. A., Wren, S. M., & Burnham, G. (2019). Health care providers in war and armed conflict: Operational and educational challenges in international humanitarian law and the Geneva conventions, part II. Educational and training initiatives. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 13(3), 383–396.
Carrasco, C. M., Muguruza, C. C., & Sánchez, R. A. (2016). Case Study: Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). Brussels: European Commission, 31.
Carswell, A. J., Abbott, K., & Croix-Rouge, C. international de la. (2013). Handbook on international rules governing military operations.
Cassese, A. (2011). International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford University Press.
Caton, J. L. (2015). Autonomous weapon systems: A brief survey of developmental, operational, legal, and ethical issues.
Colli, F., & Reykers, Y. (2023). Enemies or allies? How NGOs can push the military towards transparency around the use of force. European Journal of International Security, 8(1), 70–88.
Cook, A. D. B., & Yogendran, S. (2021). Conceptualising humanitarian civil-military partnerships in the Asia-Pacific:(Re-) ordering cooperation. In East Asia, Peacekeeping Operations, and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (pp. 35–53). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Dipua, A., Harahap, N., Puspitawati, D., Aminuddin, F., & Prakoso, L. Y. (2021). Sea defense strategy the Indonesian navy in dealing with the South China Sea Conflict. Italienisch, 11(2), 120–126.
DoD OGC. (2015). DoD Law of War Manual - June 2015 Updated Dec 2016.
Donelli, F. (2023). From humanitarianism to drones: the pragmatic flexibility of Turkey’s policy toward Sub-Saharan Africa. Federico Donelli (2023),‘From Humanitarianism to Drones: The Pragmatic Flexibility of Turkey’s Policy toward Sub-Saharan Africa’, Poliarchie, 6(1), 4–21.
Fahner, J. H., & Happold, M. (2019). The human rights defence in international investment arbitration: exploring the limits of systemic integration. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 68(3), 741–759.
Gibson, M. R. (2008). International human rights law and the administration of justice through military tribunals: Preserving utility while precluding impunity. J. Int’l L & Int’l Rel., 4, 1.
Greenberg, I. (2015). From surveillance to torture: The evolution of US interrogation practices during the War on Terror. Security Journal, 28, 165–183.
Greenwood, C. (2000). International Law and the Conduct of Military Operations: Stocktaking at the Start of a New Millenium. International Law Studies, 75(1), 17.
Hamilton, J. (2006, August). The Delicate Balance Between Civil Liberties and National Security. South African Judges Commission.
Jacobson, K. F. (2021). Pandora, We Have Found You-And You Came from Guantanamo Bay: How the Legal Legacy of Global War on Terror Detention Operations at Guantanamo Bay May Impact the Future Detention of Prisoners of War and a Proposed Means to Respond. Belmont L. Rev., 9, 1.
JDN 2-13. (2013). Commander’s Communication Synchronization Joint Doctrine Note 2-13. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/jdn_jg/jdn2_13.pdf.
JP 3-0. (2011). JP 3-0, Joint Operations. https://www.moore.army.mil/mssp/security%20topics/Potential%20Adversaries/content/pdf/JP%203-0.pdf/
Karska, E. (2016). Human rights violations committed by private military and security companies: an international law analysis. Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, 17(3), 753–766.
Khorram-Manesh, A., Mortelmans, L. J., Robinson, Y., Burkle, F. M., & Goniewicz, K. (2022). Civilian-military collaboration before and during Covid-19 pandemic—A systematic review and a pilot survey among practitioners. Sustainability, 14(2), 624.
Manurung, Y. S., Maarif, S., Toruan, T. S. L., & Swastanto, Y. (2023). Civil-Military Collaborative Governance Model in Natural Disaster Management in National Defense Policy. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 176–191.
Martin, A.-S., & Freeland, S. (2021). The advent of artificial intelligence in space activities: New legal challenges. Space Policy, 55, 101408.
Milton, C. E. (2018). Conflicted memory: Military cultural interventions and the human rights era in Peru. University of Wisconsin Pres.
Mituletu-Buica, F.-C. (2015). The International Legal Cooperation of the Application and Compliance of the International Humanitarian Law. International Scientific Conference" Strategies XXI", 2, 278.
Sewall, S. B., Raymond, D., Chin, S., & Kardos, J. (2010). MARO: Mass atrocity response operations: A military planning handbook. Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard Kennedy School.
Sharkey, N. E. (2012). The evitability of autonomous robot warfare. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 787–799.
Shelton, D. L. (2020). Advanced introduction to international human rights law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
SÎRBU, L. (2023). Legal and ethical aspects of the synchronization of military and non-military activities in multi-domain operations. Bulletin Of" Carol I" National Defence University, 12(1), 163–171.
Skaar, E., García-Godos, J., & Collins, C. (2016). Transitional justice in Latin America: the uneven road from impunity towards accountability. Routledge.
Tardy, T. (2018). Does European defence really matter? Fortunes and misfortunes of the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Security, 27(2), 119–137.
Terziev, V., Madanski, V., & Kanev, D. (2017a). Entry opportunities in the bulgarian military-educational system and ensuring of civil rights. Proceedings of SOCIOINT.
Terziev, V., Madanski, V., & Kanev, D. (2017b). Entry opportunities in the bulgarian military-educational system and ensuring of civil rights. Proceedings of SOCIOINT.
Titko, E., Kurovska, I., Korniienko, P., Balzhyk, I. A., & Stoyatska, G. M. (2021). Military-civil interaction through the prism of human rights protection: the experience of the ECtHR. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 649–666.
United Nations. (2009, August). UN human rights experts encouraged by US Government efforts to increase oversight and accountability over private security contractors but concerned by gaps in access to effective remedy for victims of human rights violations. UN Human Rights.
United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). International legal protection of human rights in armed conflict. United Nations.
Ussouthcom. (2009). Unclassified for General Officers And Flag Officers Human Rights Awareness Education.
Valayden, D. (2020). The Littoral Combat Ship, or the Designs of Liquid Sovereignty. Writing Beyond the State: Post-Sovereign Approaches to Human Rights in Literary Studies, 155–174.
Wezeman, P. D., & Wezeman, S. T. (2014, January 29). Balancing transparency and national security. SIPRI. https://www.sipri.org/node/405.
Yamashita, H. (2015). New humanitarianism and changing logics of the political in international relations. Millennium, 43(2), 411–428.
Make A Submission 
