Inovasi Digital Governance dalam Tata Kelola Wilayah Maritim Pesisir
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v6i1.894Keywords:
Digital Governance, Kebijakan Publik, Wilayah Maritim Pesisir, Pelayanan Publik, PapuaAbstract
Wilayah maritim pesisir Papua memiliki potensi sumber daya kelautan yang sangat besar, namun masih menghadapi sejumlah tantangan dalam tata kelola, seperti kurangnya data, lemahnya koordinasi antar lembaga, serta rendahnya kualitas layanan publik di sektor kelautan. Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi membuka peluang untuk menerapkan digital governance sebagai pendekatan inovatif dalam kebijakan pengelolaan wilayah maritim pesisir. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran inovasi digital governance dalam meningkatkan efektivitas tata kelola wilayah maritim pesisir Papua serta mengidentifikasi tantangan kebijakan yang muncul dalam pelaksanaannya. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode kajian kebijakan melalui analisis dokumen regulasi, kebijakan pemerintah, dan literatur ilmiah yang relevan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan digital governance memiliki potensi untuk meningkatkan transparansi, integrasi data kelautan, akuntabilitas kebijakan, serta kualitas layanan publik di wilayah pesisir. Namun, keterbatasan infrastruktur digital, kapasitas sumber daya manusia, dan kesenjangan literasi digital masyarakat pesisir masih menjadi kendala utama. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kebijakan publik yang adaptif, inklusif, dan kontekstual untuk memastikan inovasi digital governance dapat diimplementasikan secara berkelanjutan dalam tata kelola wilayah maritim pesisir Papua.
References
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (2001). Communities and the environment: Ethnicity, gender, and the state in community-based conservation. Rutgers University Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
Bappenas. (2020). Rencana pembangunan jangka menengah nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas Republik Indonesia.
Bennett, N. J., et al. (2019). Local support for conservation is associated with perceptions of good governance, social impacts, and ecological effectiveness. Conservation Letters, 12(4), e12640. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12640
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2011). The Ashgate research companion to new public management. Ashgate Publishing.
Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic. Information Polity, 24(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190113
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2015). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu010
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). In Routledge Handbook of Development and Management. Routledge.
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30(S1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 392–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564308
Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
OECD. (2020). Digital government index 2019: Results and key findings. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en
Pratama, A. B. (2020). Digital government transformation in Indonesia. Public Policy and Administration Research, 10(3), 12–21.
Purwaka, T. (2018). Kebijakan kelautan Indonesia dalam perspektif hukum internasional. Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 15(2), 213–230.
Rokhman, A. (2011). E-government adoption in developing countries. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236.
Satria, A. (2015). Pengantar sosiologi masyarakat pesisir. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP. (2019). Human development report: Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today. United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP. (2021). Digital transformation and inclusive governance. United Nations Development Programme.
UNESCO. (2022). Local knowledge, indigenous peoples and digital transformation. UNESCO Publishing.
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity Press.
World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank Publications.
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication (IJI Publication)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Make A Submission 
