Otoritarianisme World Governance dalam Serial Anime One Piece
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v6i1.837Keywords:
Otoritarianisme, Perlawanan, Pemerintahan Dunia, One Piece, Ilmu PemerintahanAbstract
Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji konfigurasi kekuasaan global yang direpresentasikan melalui struktur pemerintahan fiktif “World Government” dalam anime One Piece, dengan menyoroti praktik otoritarianisme, dinamika hegemoni, serta bentuk-bentuk resistensi dari aktor-aktor non negara. Pendekatan yang digunakan bersifat kualitatif-deskriptif dengan analisis wacana sebagai metode utama, menguraikan simbol, narasi, dan ideologi yang membentuk imaji pemerintahan dunia dalam karya populer tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa World Government dalam One Piece mencerminkan karakteristik rezim otoriter modern yang menjustifikasi kekuasaan sentral melalui legalitas birokratis, kontrol informasi, dan penindasan terhadap oposisi. Sementara itu, kelompok bajak laut Topi Jerami (Straw Hat Pirates), merepresentasikan gerakan perlawanan yang berlandaskan pada nilai kebebasan, keadilan sosial, dan hak individu melawan absolutisme negara. Analisis ini mengungkap bahwa One Piece berfungsi bukan hanya sebagai hiburan, tetapi juga sebagai ruang reflektif terhadap isu-isu politik kontemporer seperti korupsi kekuasaan, propaganda, serta perjuangan rakyat melawan dominasi struktur global. Dengan demikian, kajian ini memperluas horizon Ilmu Pemerintahan melalui integrasi antara budaya populer dan teori politik, menegaskan pentingnya membaca fenomena otoritarianisme dan perlawanan dari perspektif representasi budaya digital masa kini.
References
Arxiv.org. (2024). Analysis of bipartite networks in anime series: Textual analysis, topic clustering, and modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18732
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: A new outlook for qualitative research (3rd edition). Sage.
Cooper, L. (2021). Authoritarian protectionism and the end of neoliberal hegemony. PMC, 10004438. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing between five approaches (4th edition). Sage.
Esen, B., & Gumuscu, S. (2022). The rise of authoritarianism in Turkey. Cambridge University Press.
Faturochman, & Arifin, Z. (2022). Pendekatan sistemik untuk analisis dan transformasi konflik: Studi kasus konflik sosial di Desa Balinuraga. Jurnal Sosiologi, 24(1), 30–44.https://jurnalsosiologi.fisip.unila.ac.id/index.php/js/article/view/199/121
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment: Prison birth. Vintage Books.
Gerschewski, J. (2021). How democracies prevail: Democratic resilience as a two-stage process. Democratization, 28(5), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1914506
Government capability. (2020). Decolonization of government science: Local perspectives in global theory. Journal of Governance, 12(2), 89-104.
Gramsci, A. (1971). A selection from the prison notebook. International Publishers.
Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (2021). Democratic decline in the 21st century. Journal of Democracy, 32(1), 5-19.
Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption, and influence in transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2444.
Hsu, S., Tsai, K.S., & Chang, C. (2021). Evolutionary government in China: State-society relations under authoritarianism. Springer.
Jenkins, H. (2018). Popular culture and governmentality. Polity Press.
Johnston, T. (2021). Samizdat: The voice of the Soviet opposition. Verso Books.
journalisslp.com. (2024, March 15). Digital sovereignty and transnational governance: Legal dilemmas in the 21st century.https://journalisslp.com/digital-sovereignty
Kalyvas, S.N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
Kelemen, R., et al. (2021). The new state we are building: Authoritarianism and the justification of the system. PMC, 8450331. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx
Koleva, S., Yom-Tov, E., Keshet, I., Zubarev, M., Morgenstern, Y., & Keren, G. (2018). Power corrupts, but control does not: What stands behind the effects of holding high positions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(2), 180–193.
Levitsky, S., & Way, L.A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of methods (3rd edition). Sage.
Oda, E. (1997–sekarang). One Piece. Shueisha.
One Piece Wiki. (n.d.-a). World Government. https://onepiece.fandom.com/wiki/World_Government
One Piece Wiki. (n.d.-b). Five Elders. https://onepiece.fandom.com/wiki/Five_Elders
One Piece Wiki. (n.d.-c). Celestial Dragons (Tenryuubito).https://onepiece.fandom.com/wiki/Celestial_Dragons
Ostrom, E. (1990). Organizing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Prentice-Hall.
Pollock, F. (2024). Komunikasi sebagai alat kontrol sosial: Analisis kritis berdasarkan pemikiran Friedrich Pollock. Jurnal Komunikasi Uniska, 13(1), 30-41. https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_komunikasi/article/view/7244
Power, S. (2023). The Rohingya refugee crisis: political and humanitarian perspectives. International Journal of Human Rights, 27(8), 1263–1281. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHR-09-2023-0188/full/html
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
Sumitro, R. L., & Adiwilaga, A. Z. (2023). Rahasia terungkap: Menganalisis dinamika keamanan pers pada masa Orde Baru (1966-1998). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 20-34. https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ilmukom/article/view/5758
Santos, B. de S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.
Svolik, MW (2024). Authoritarian multiparty government: Survival strategies in hybrid regimes. PMC, 11601049. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx
Tan, B. (2020). Anime, society, and political power. Springer.
Thomas, P. D. (2009). Gramsci and the political economy of mass media. Critical Review of International
Published
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication (IJI Publication)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










